Stop Conflict, Reduce Fragility and End Poverty:
Doing Things Differently in Fragile and Conflict-affected Situations
1. One of the great development challenges of our time is to help countries affected by
conflict and fragility find a path towards sustainable peace and development. The World
Bank Group has set the twin goals of ending extreme poverty within a generation and boosting
shared prosperity in all countries. Reaching those goals means sharpening the focus on the
world’s fragile and conflict affected situations. They are the most challenged in the developing
world in meeting the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by 2015 - a deadline now less
than 1000 days away.
2. As the 2011 World Development Report on Conflict, Security and Development
revealed, one in four people on the planet live in areas affected by repeated cycles of political
and criminal violence. People in fragile and conflicted-affected situations (FCS)
are more than
twice as likely to be under-nourished as those in other developing countries, more than three
times as likely to be unable to send their children to school, twice as likely to see their children
die before age five, and more than twice as likely to lack clean water. Half of all child deaths
occur in conflict affected areas.
3. On average, a country that experiences major violence has a poverty rate significantly
higher than a country that had no violence. A similar picture emerges for areas affected by
violence in richer and more stable countries – areas where development lags behind. While
many developing countries have made tremendous progress in poverty reduction over the last
decade, many fragile and conflict-affected situations have experienced repeated cycles of
violence that undermines development progress.
4. To meet the challenge of ending extreme poverty by 2030, there is a clear case for an
even greater focus on the fragile and conflict affected states and situations. Recent World Bank
research shows that some countries can get caught in a fragility trap, a low-level equilibrium
with the self-reinforcing features of weak institutions, low investment, slow growth and the
possibility of repeated cycles of violence.
A civil conflict costs the average developing country
roughly 30 years of GDP growth.
5. Despite these devastating impacts, countries can and do find pathways out of fragility and
conflict. Since 2004, 11 countries have graduated from fragile state status through steady
progress in building institutions and strengthening policies.
These countries had economic
Unless otherwise specified, the term FCS in this document refers to countries or territories that have a harmonized
average Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) rating of 3.2 or less (or no CPIA), and/or have or have
had a UN and/or regional peace-keeping or peace-building mission during the past three years. In 2013, FCS
included 31 IDA eligible countries, 3 IBRD eligible countries and the territory of West Bank and Gaza.
Noro Aina Andrimihaja, Matthias Cinyabuguma and Shanta Devarajan (Nov 2011), “Avoiding the Fragility Trap
in Africa,” World Bank Africa Region Policy Research Working Paper 5884).
World Development Report 2011 on Conflict, Security and Development, hereafter WDR 2011.
Cambodia, Djibouti, the Gambia, Georgia, Lao PDR, Niger, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea, Sao Tome and Principe,
Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.